ÖRGÜTSEL KİMLİK VE GÜVEN ALGILAMALARININ ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-8
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 274-285
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Rekabetin küresel bir nitelik kazanmasıyla birlikte, örgütlerin sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı elde etmede kullanabilecekleri temel yeteneklerin önemi son derece artmıştır. Temel yeteneklerin oluşturulmasında ve korunmasında anahtar işlev hiç kuşkusuz çalışanların örgütü ve örgütün faaliyetlerini sahiplenmeleri yani örgütle özdeşleşmeleridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akademik personel örneğinde, örgütsel kimlik ve güven algılamalarının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisini analiz etmektir. Araştırma bulguları, örgütsel kimlik ve örgütsel güven algılamalarının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerinde pozitif yönlü bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Yapılan Kruskal-Wallis farklılık analizleri sonucunda ise yaş bağımsız değişkeni itibariyle örgütsel aidiyet algısında farklılıkların olduğu, ayrıca akademik unvan bakımında da örgütsel güven ve özdeşleşme düzeyleri arasında anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu tespit edilmiştir.  Bu bulgulara dayanarak, örgütsel güven ve örgütsel kimlik algılamalarında meydana gelen olumlu bir gelişmenin örgütsel özdeşleşmeyi de arttırabileceği söylenebilir.

Keywords

Abstract

In today’s world, core competence of afirm is an important tool to achieve sustainable strategic advantage in the market. In order to establish the core competence of a firm, organizational identification comes to the front as an important topic. Thus, in this study we aimed to examine the influence of organizational identity and trust on organizational identification. The data were collected through a survey from academic staff working at a public university. Regression analyses demonstrate that organizational trust and organizational identity perceptions have increased the level of employee’s identification. In the analysis of Kruskal-Wallis, it was determined that there is a difference in organizational identity perceptions within the context of independent variable age and that there is a significant difference between organizational trust and identification levels of the participants, considering their academic titles. In accordance with these findings, we can assert that the positive outcomes on organizational trust and organizational identiy will be heighten the levels of organizational identification.

Keywords


  • Akın, A. (2004). Mülkiyet Sahipliğinden Kaynaklanan Yönetim Hakkının Devri Açısından Post-

  • Akın, A. (2004). Mülkiyet Sahipliğinden Kaynaklanan Yönetim Hakkının Devri Açısından Post-Modern Yönetsel Kontrol Yaklaşımları ve Stratejileri. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (22), 127-148.

  • Albrecht, S. L. (2002). Perceptions of Integrity, Competence and Trust in Senior Management asDeterminants of Cynicism Toward Change. Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 7(4), 320-343.

  • Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. A. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.

  • Asunakutlu, T. (2002). Örgütsel Güvenin Oluşturulmasına İlişkin Unsurlar ve Bir Değerlendirme. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (9), 1-13.

  • Ates, M. F., Mert, I. S., & Turgut, H. (2017). The Indirect Effect of Organizational Prestige on theEffect of Organizational Trust and Organizational Support on Organizational Identification. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(18), 103-117.

  • Belanger, F. and Carter, L. (2008). Trust and Risk in E-Government Adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165-176.

  • Blomqvist K. and Stahle, P. (2000). Building Organizational Trust. Paper Presented at the 16th Annual IMP Conference, 07-09 September, UK.

  • Bromiley, P. and Cummings, L. L. (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI), ed.: Roderick M. Kramer and Tom R. Tyler, Trust in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, Sage.

  • Carmeli, A., Gilat, G. and Waldman, D. A. (2007). The Role of Perceived OrganizationalPerformance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and Job Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972-992.

  • Chan, S. H. (2006). Organizational Identification and Commitment of Members of a Human Development Organization. Journal of Management Development, 25(3), 249-268.

  • Cook, J. and Wall, T. (1980). New Works Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-Fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, (53), 39-52.

  • Copeland, M. P., Reynolds, K. J. and Burton, J. B. (2008). Social Identity, Status Characteristicsand Social Networks: Predictors of Advice Seeking in A Manufacturing Facility. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, (11), 75–87.

  • Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A. and Balmer, J. M. T. (2007). Social Identity, OrganizationalIdentity and Corporate Identity: Towards an Integrated Understanding of Processes, Patternings and Products. British Journal of Management, (18), 1-16.

  • DeConinck, J. B. (2011). The Effects of Ethical Climate on Organizational Identification,Supervisory Trust, and Turnover among Salespeople. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 617-624.Demircan, N. ve Ceylan, A. (2003). Örgütsel Güven Kavramı: Nedenleri ve Sonuçları. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 10(2), 139-150.

  • Deng, N. (2000). Exploring the Relationships Between Corporate Identity, Trust, and Accounting Information: A Literature Review. Master Thesis, Göteborg University.

  • Dukerich J.M., Golden B. and Shortell, S.M. (2002). Beauty is in The Eye of The Beholder: TheImpact of Organizational Identification, Identity and Image on Physician Cooperative Behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 507-533.

  • Dutton, J., Dukerich, J. and Harquail, C.V. (1994) Organizational Images and Membership Commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, (34), 239-263.

  • Flanagan, C. (2003). Trust, Identity, and Civic Hope. Applied Development Science, 7(3), 165-171.Halis, M., Gökgöz, G. S. ve Yaşar, Ö. (2007). Örgütsel Güvenin Belirleyici Faktörleri veBankacılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (17), 187-205.

  • Halsam, S. A., Postmes, T. And Ellemers, N. (2003). More than a Metaphor: Organizational Identity Makes Organizational Life Possible. British Journal of Management, (14), 357-369.

  • Han, J. J., Zheng, R. J. and Xu, Y. (2007). The Effect of Individual Needs, Trust and Identificationin Explaining Participation Intentions in Virtual Communities. Proceedings of the 40th HawaiiInternational Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, Big Island, Hawaii.

  • Huemer, L. (2004). Balancing Between Stability and Variety: Identiti and Trust Trade-Off in Networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3): 251-259.

  • Huemer, L., Becerra, M. and Lunnan, R. (2004). Organizational Identity and NetworkIdentification: Relating Within and Beyond Imaginary Boundaries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, (20), 53-73.

  • Huff, L. and Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of Organizational Trust in Individualist Versus Collectivist Societies: A Seven-National Study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81-90.

  • İşcan, Ö. F. (2006). Dönüştürücü/Etkileşimci Liderlik Algısı ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İlişkisinde Bireysel Farklılıkların Rolü. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, (11), 160-177.

  • Jiang, Z., Gollan, P. J., & Brooks, G. (2017). Relationships between Organizational Justice,Organizational Trust and Organizational Commitment: A Cross-cCultural Study of China, SouthKorea and Australia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(7), 973-1004.

  • Jucevicius, G., & Juceviciene, R. (2015). Smart Development of Organizational Trust: Dilemmas and Paradoxes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 860-866.

  • Karatepe, S. (2008). İtibar Yönetimi: Halkla İlişkilerde Güven Yaratma. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(23), 77-97.

  • Kitapçı, H., Çakar, N. D. ve Sezen, B. (2005). The Combined Effects of Trust and Employee Identification on Intention to Quit. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(12), 33-41.

  • Koohang, A., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Goluchowski, J. (2017). The Impact of Leadership on Trust,Knowledge Management, and Organizational Performance: A Research model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 521-537.

  • Lane, V. R. and Scott, S. G. (2007). The Neural Network Model of Organizational Identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (104), 175-192.

  • Lee, H. J. (2004). The Role of Competence-Based Trust and Organizational Identification in Continuous Improvement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 623-639.

  • Loerwald, D., & Retzmann, T. (2010). Misselling as a New Topic of Financial Education? ADidactic Analysis of Investment Advise after the Financial Crisis. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 9(1), 49-58.

  • Mael, F. A. and Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of TheReformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (13), 103-123.

  • Mael, F. A. and Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, Organizational Identification, and Turnover Among Newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 309–333.

  • Melewar, T. C. (2003). Determinants of the Corporate Identity Construct: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Marketing Communications, 9(4), 195-220.

  • Mills, M. R. and Bettis, P. J. (2006). Organizational Identity and Identification During aDepartmental Reorganization. ed.: Vincent A. A., Norma T. M., Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications.

  • Ng, T. W. (2015). The Incremental Validity of Organizational Commitment, Organizational Trust, and Organizational Identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 154-163.

  • Oostveen, A. and Besselaar, P. V. D. (2005). Trust, Identity, and the Effects of Voting Technologies on Voting Behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 304-311.

  • Poole, W. L. (2008). Intersections of Organizational Justice and Identity Under the New PolicyDirection: Important Understandings for Educational Leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(1), 23-42.

  • Porter, T. and Lilly, B. (1996). The Effects of Conflict, Trust, and Task Commitment on Project Team Performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, (7), 361-376.

  • Puusa, A. and Tolvanen, U. (2006). Organizational Identity and Trust. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 11(2), 29-33.

  • Robinson, S. (1996). Trust and the Breach of the Psychological Contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, (41), 574-599.

  • Schaubroeck, J. M., Peng, A. C., & Hannah, S. T. (2013). Developing Trust with Peers andLeaders: Impacts on Organizational Identification and Performance During Entry. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1148-1168.

  • Serper, Ö. ve Aytaç, M. (2000). Örnekleme. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.

  • Tüzün, İ. K. (2006). Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Kimlik ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İlişkisi: UygulamalıBir Çalışma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.

  • Tüzün, İ. K. ve Çağlar, İ. (2007). Güven, Örgütsel Kimlik Özellikleri ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeİlişkisi: Görgül Bir Çalışma. XV. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Sakarya Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F., (25-27 Mayıs), 525-533.

  • Twyman, M., Harvey, N. And Harries, C. (2008). Trust in Motives, Trust in Competence: SeparateFactors Determining The Effectiveness of Risk Communication. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 111–120.

  • Ural, A. ve Kılıç, İ. (2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

  • Verburg, R. M., Nienaber, A. M., Searle, R. H., Weibel, A., Den Hartog, D. N., & Rupp, D. E.(2018). The role of organizational control systems in employees’ organizational trust and performance outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 43(2), 179-206.

  • Webster, J. And Wong, W. K. P. (2008). Comparing Traditional and Virtual Group Forms: İdentity,Communication and Trust in Naturally Occurring Project Teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 41-62.

  • Witting, M. (2006). “Relations Between Organizational Identity, Identification and OrganizationalObjectives: An Empirical Study in Municipalities”, http://essay. utwente.nl/55524/1/Scriptie_Witting.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.02.2018)

  • Zabalak, P. S., Ellis, K. and Winograd, G. (2000). Organizational Trust: What It Means, Why It Matters. Organization Development Journal, 18(4), 35-48.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics