Author :
Abstract
Tıpkı vekâlet teorisinde olduğu gibi temsil teorisinin de temel odak noktası, sermaye veya işletme sahipleri ile bunlara vekillik yapmakla görevlendirilen profesyonel yöneticiler arasındaki ilişkidir. Ancak vekâlet teorisinden farklı olarak temsil teorisi, her iki tarafın da çıkarlarını birlikte maksimize etmeye çalışan bir teoridir. Bunun sebebi ise, bu iki önemli paydaşın birbirinden ayrı bir hedef belirlemeyip aynı hedef ve amaçlar için birlikte çalışmaları gerektiği varsayımıdır. Sağlık profesyonelleri ile hastaların temel amaç ve hedeflerinin aynı olması sebebi ile bu çalışmanın motivasyon kaynağıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı temsil teorisinin sağlık hizmetlerindeki yansımalarını ortaya koymak ve bu konuda var olan dağınık bilgiyi bir makalede birleştirmektir. Bu çalışma için genel literatür bilgisi toplanmış ve konu ile ilgili çalışmalardan alıntı ve esinlenme yöntemi ile bilgiler bir araya getirilmiştir. Bu çalışma kapsamında elde edilen verilerin ışığında sağlık sektöründe yer alan paydaşlar arasındaki ilişkisinin planlanmasında ve sistemin kurgulanıp uygulamaya geçilmesinde çok yönlü düşünülmesi gerektiği önerilebilir. Ayrıca kalite kurulları, denetleme otoriteleri, sigorta şirketleri, dış gözlemciler ve sağlık politikacılarının, sağlık sisteminde yer alan bütün paydaşların ilişkilerini dikkate alan olası malpraktis veya gereksiz sağlık hizmeti kullanımını engelleyici önlemler alması gerektiği önerilebilir.
Keywords
Abstract
Just like Agency theory, the main focus of Stewardship theory is the relationship between capital or business owners and professional managers who are tasked with acting as agents. The reason for this is the assumption that these two important stakeholders should not set a separate target and work together for the same goals and objectives. Unlike Agency theory, however, Stewardship is a theory that tries to maximize the interests of both parties together. It is the motivation source of this study because the basic goals and objectives of healthcare professionals and patients are the same. The aim of this study is to reveal the reflections of the theory of Stewardship in health services and to combine the scattered information on this subject in an article. For this study, general literature information has been collected and information has been brought together with the method of citation and inspiration from the relevant studies. In the light of the data obtained within the scope of this study, it can be suggested that a multi-faceted consideration should be made in planning the relationship between the stakeholders in the health sector and establishing and implementing the system. In addition, it may be suggested that quality boards, supervisors, insurance companies, external observers and health politicians should take measures to prevent possible malpractice or unnecessary use of healthcare, taking into account the relationships of all stakeholders in the health system.
Keywords
- Akerlof, G.A. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The
- Akerlof, G.A. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
- Akın, A. (2004). Mülkiyet Sahipliğinden Kaynaklanan Yönetim Hakkının Devri Açısından Post- Modern
- Akkaş, E. (2012). “Vekâlet Teorisi Çerçevesinde Hasta-Hekim İlişkileri Üzerine Bir Çalışma:Isparta İl Merkezi Hastaneleri Örneği”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sağlık Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, Isparta.
- Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz (1972). 'Production, information costs, and economic organization'. American Economic Review, 62, pp. 777-795.
- Alp, A. ve Kılıç, S. (2014). Kurumsal Yönetim Nasıl Yönetilmeli (1.Baskı). İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.
- Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1990). Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing.
- Armstrong JL. (1997). Stewardship and public service. Ottawa, Canadian Public Service Commission, (discussion paper).
- Arthurs, J. D., & Busenitz, L. W. (2003). The boundaries and limitations of agency theory andstewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 145–162.
- Ataay, A. (2006). Aile Şirketlerinde Başkacılık ve Koruma: Vekâlet Maliyetleri, 2. Aile İşletmeleri Kongre
- Barney, J.B., Busenitz, L., Fiet, J.O., & Moesel, D. (1989). The structure of venture capitalgovernance: An organizational economic analysis of relations between venture capital firms andnew ventures. Best papers proceedings of the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, D.C.
- Brinkerhoff DW, Bossert TJ. (2014). Health governance: principal–agent linkages and health system strengthening. Health Policy Plan. 29: 685–93.
- Çelik, Y. (2011). Sağlık Ekonomisi. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
- Daily, C.M., McDougall, P.P., Covin, J.G., & Dalton, D.R. (2003). Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management, 28, 387–412.
- Dalton, D.R., and I.F. Kesner, 1987, Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: an
- Davis J, Donaldson L, Schoorman D. (1997). Towards a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, , 22 (1), 20–47.
- Detels, R., Gulliford, M., Kerim, Q. A., ve Tan, C. C. (2015). Oxford Text Book of Global Public Health. Six Edition, Volume 1, The Practice of Public Health (Oxford). 2015, Oxford.
- Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and
- Donaldson, L., (1985). In Defence of Organization Theory, A Reply to the Critics. Economic & Business Studies, S.5/6(4), ss.423- 435.
- Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
- Fricke, P., & Etzioni, A. (1976). A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. Political Science Quarterly, 91(2), 341. doi:10.2307/2148419.
- Flood, C.M. (2001). International Experience with Managed Care, Managed Competition andInternal Markets: Lessons for Canada. 02.03.2019 tarihinde
- Gaynor, M. and Vogt, W.B. (1999) Antitrust and Competition in Health Care Markets. NBER Working Paper, No: 7112, 1-89.
- Herzberg, F., B. Mausner, and B. Snyderman, (2011). The Motivation to Work (Transaction Publishers New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.).
- Hewitt-Taylor, J. and Bond, C.S. (2012). What E-Patients Want From the Doctor-PatientRelationship: Content Analysis of Posts on Discussion Boards. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e155: 1-9.
- Hwa, Y.S. (2005). Principal-Agent Relationship in Medical Care: Eliciting Patients’ Preferences in Patient-Doctor Relationship. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 39, 71-88.
- Institute of Medicine, (2011). Digital Infrastructure for the Learning Health System: TheFoundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Health Care: Workshop Series Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12912.
- Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. H. (1976), “Theory of Firm: managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, 305-360.
- Jiang, H.J., Lockee, C. and Fraser, I. (2012). Enhancing Board Oversight on Quality of Hospital Care: An Agency Theory Perspektive. Health Care Management Review, 37(2), 144-153.
- Kass HD. (1990). Stewardship as a fundamental element in images of public administration. In:Kass HD, Catron B, eds. Images and identities in public administration.London, Sage, 1990: 113– 131.
- Kesner, I.F. and D.L. Dalton, (1986). Boards of Directors and the checks and (im)balances of Kitabı, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
- Koçer, B. (2006). İçsel Bir Yönetişim Mekanizması Olarak Yönetim Kurulları: İMKB’de İşlemGören Şirketlerin Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı ve İşlevleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ankara: Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu Yayınları.
- Korn/Ferry International, (1988). Eighth Annual Survey of Boards of Directors in Australia, Sydney.
- Lee, J., Choi, Y., Lee, S.H., Sung, N., Kim, S. and Hong, J.Y. (2013). Association of the Length ofDoctor-Patient Relationship with Primary Care Quality in Seven Family Practices in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28, 508-515.
- Leonard, K.L. (2009). The Cost of Imperfect Agency in Health Care: Evidence from Rural Cameroun. Journal of Development Economics, 88, 282-91.
- McClelland, D.C., 1961, The Achieving Society (Princeton, N.J., Van Nostrand).McGregor, D., 1960, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York, McGraw Hill).
- Mengi, B. T. (2013). Bağımsız Denetimin Vekâlet Teorisindeki Yeri. World of Accounting Science, 15(1).
- Muth, M. and Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: A Contingency Approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, S.6(1), pp.5-28.
- Nafees, A. A. ve Nayani, P. (2011). Stewardship in Health Policy and its relevance to Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc, Vol. 61, No. 8, August 2011.
- Nguyen, H. (2011). The Principal-Agent Problems in Health Care: Evidence from Prescribing Patterns of Private Providers in Vietnam. Health Policy and Planning, 26, i53-i62.
- Peterson, T. (1993). The Economics of Organization: The Principal-Agent Relationship. Acta Sociologica, 36, 277-293.
- RAND (2006). The Health Insurance Experiment: A Classic RAND Study Speaks to the Current Health Care Reform Debate. 26.03.2017 tarihinde http://www.rand.org adresinden alınmıştır.
- Sahlman, W. (1990). The structure and governance of venture capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 473–524.
- Saltman, R. B. and Ferroussier-Davis, O. (2000). The concept of stewardship in health policy. The World Health Report 2000. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78 (6).
- Sapienza, H.J. & Gupta, A.K. (1994). Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalistentrepreneur relations. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1618–1632.
- Shmanske, S. (1996). Information Asymmetries in Health Services: The Market Can Cope, The Independent Review, 1(2), 191-200.
- Silverman, D., (1970). The Theory of Organisations (London, Heinemann).
- Top, S. and Öge, E. (2012). İşletmelerde Vekâlet Teorisinin Öngörü ve Varsayımları BağlamındaYönetim Olgusuna Genel Bir Bakış. T. C. Anadolu Bil Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 27-28, 62-83.
- Topcu, A. (2007). Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamalarının Firma Değeri Üzerine Etkileri.(Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi / Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü / İşletme Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı.
- Usul, H. (2005). Modern Yönetim Muhasebesi Anlayışına Post-Modern Bir Yaklaşım. Review of Social, Economic & Business Studies, S.5/6(4), ss.423- 435.
- Vick, S. and Scott, A. (1998). Agency in Health Care: Examining Patients’ Preferences for Attributes of the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 587-605.
- Wasti, N. (2013). İktisadi Örgüt Kuramları. in D. Taşcı & E. Erdemir (ed.). Örgüt Kuramı, Eskişehir: T. C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, 104-119.
- Wong, I.O.L., Lindner, M.J., Cowling, B.J., Lau, E.H.Y., Lo, S. and Leung, G.M. (2010).Measuring Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection by Propensity Scoring in the Mixed Health Care Economoy of Hong Kong. Health Policy, 95, 24-35.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). 2000. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems:Improving Performance. Geneva: WHO. Online at: https://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/, Erişim Tarihi: 28.12.2019
