THE ISRAEL-PALESTINE CONFLICT IN THE EU FOREIGN POLICY PROCESS

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-31
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 546-557
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Genişleme ve derinleşme adımlarını kullanan AB, Neo-fonksiyonalist bir bütünleşmeyle ekonomik birliktelikten siyasi bütünleşmeye doğru yol almıştır. Bu süreçle olası krizlere yönelik ortak pozisyon alma amacıyla dış politikaya ağırlık vermeye başlamıştır. Uluslararası sistemde her geçen gün ağırlığı artan AB, ekonomik yardımlar ve demokrasi vurgusuyla normatif bir güç olarak etkili bir aktör olmaya çalışmaktadır. Kimi zaman gücün ayrı yapısına vurgu yapan AB konuya bağlı olarak askeri, sivil veya normatif gücünü ön plana çıkarmaktadır. Küresel, bölgesel krizlerde hızlı ve ortak bir tepki geliştirmek isteyen AB, Maastricht Antlaşması’yla ortak dış ve güvenlik politikasını hayata geçirmiştir. AB dış politikasının temelini oluşturan ortak eylem-politika araçları, AB’nin ilk dış politika alanı olan İsrail-Filistin çatışmasında kullanılmıştır. Diplomasiyle birlikte ekonomik unsurları da kullanan AB, baskı kurarak çözümün bir parçası olmaya çalışmaktadır. Ekonomik yaptırım ve diplomatik bir dille sivil karakterine vurgu yapan AB, belirli ilkelere dayalı ortak bir pozisyon geliştirmiştir. AB üye ülkeleri, İsrail-Filistin çatışmasında uluslararası arenada da eylemlerine yansıyan bütünlük, tutarlılık ve dolayısıyla “tek seslilik ”ilkelerini sağlamıştır. ABD’nin taraf olduğu eylemlerde daha hızlı karar alabilen AB, tek başına kaldığında ise güvenirlik ve etkinlik hususlarında sorun yaşamıştır. Bu nedenle AB, uluslararası politikaları etkileyen ve yürütülmesine mali kaynaklarla yardımcı olan, başat aktör olmaktan uzak, sivil bir güç konumundadır.

Keywords

Abstract

The EU has moved from economic union to political integration with a neo-functionalist integration by using the enlargement and deepening steps. The EU started to focus on foreign policy in order to take a joint position against possible crises with this process. The EU, whose weight is increasing day by day in the international system, tries to be an effective actor as a normative power with its emphasis on economic aid and democracy. The EU, sometimes emphasizes the separate structure of power, highlights its military, civilian or normative power in the foreground depending on the issue. The EU, that wants to develop a fast and common response to global and regional crises by implementing the common foreign and security policy with the Maastricht Treaty. The common action-policy tools that form the basis of EU foreign policy, were used in the Israel-Palestine conflict, which was the first foreign policy area of the EU. The EU using economic elements together by diplomacy, is trying to be part of the solution by putting pressure. The EU has developed a common position based on certain principles by emphasizing its civilian character and diplomatic language. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the EU member states have ensured the principles of integrity, consistency and hence “univocal” which are also reflected in their actions in the international arena. The EU, which has been able to make faster decisions in actions to which the USA is a party, has problems with reliability and efficiency when it is left alone. For this reason, the EU is in the position of a civilian power, far from being the main actor, influencing international policies and helping their implementation with financial resources.

Keywords


  • Armaoğlu, F. (2019). Filistin Meselesi ve Arap-İsrail Savaşları (1948-1988), 5. Baskı. İstanbul: Kronik

  • Armaoğlu, F. (2019). Filistin Meselesi ve Arap-İsrail Savaşları (1948-1988), 5. Baskı. İstanbul: Kronik Yayıncılık.

  • Bouris, D. and Brown, N.J. (2014). “Can The EU Revive the Cause of Middle East Peace?” Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  • Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (2006). The European Union as a global actor. New York: Routledge.

  • B’Tselem (2017). Activity Report, 29.03.2021. Available online at: https://www.btselem.org/about_btselem/btselems_activity_reports

  • Cicioğlu, F., Gamze, B. (2017). Avrupa Birliği’nin Filistin-İsrail Sorununa Yönelik Politikası. 2nd International Congress on Political, Economic and Social Studies (ICPESS), 19-22 May, 43-57.

  • Council Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP (2005). of 14 November 2005 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories, Official Journal of the European Union, 17.11.2005. L 300/65-69.

  • Council Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP (2005). of 12 December 2005 on establishing a European UnionBorder Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah), Official Journal of the European Union, 14.12.2005. L 327/28-32.

  • Dağcı, K. ve Sak, E. (2015). AB’nin Dış Politikası Açısından Filistin-İsrail Sorununa Temel Yaklaşımı ve Araçları: Deklarasyonlar ve Ekonomik Yardımlar, Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(10), 9-30.

  • EC & High Representative. (2015, 25 March). Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy inPalestine: Progress 2014 and Recommendations for action (SWD (2015)71 final). Brussels, Belgium: EEAS S. Available online at: https://eeas.europa.eu/enp/pdf/2015/palestine-enpreport-2015_en.pdf

  • EEAS European External Action Service (2013). European Union-Palestinian Authority Action Plan:Political Chapeau. Brussels, Belgium: Available online at: http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/pdf/pdf/action_plans/pa_enp_ap_final_en.

  • Esen, B. (2019). Bölünmüşlük Gölgesinde Çatışma Çözümü; Asimetrik Güç Filistin ve İsrail. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.

  • EU Foreign Affairs Council (2009, 8 December). European Union-Palestinian Authority Action Plan,Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites /near/files/eu- palestine_action_plan_2013.pdf

  • Euractiv (2012, 30 November). EU divided in UN vote on Palestine’s status, Available online at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/eu-divided-in-un-vote-on-palestine-s-status/

  • European Commission (2009, 27 February). The EU in the Middle East Peace Process, Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner /detail/en/MEMO_09

  • European Commission (2018, 26 November). The Annual action programme in favour of Palestine for 2018,Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu /neighbourhood- enlargement/sites/near/files/c_2018_7933_palestine_aap_2018.pdf.

  • European Commission (2020, 24 June). Palestine, Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/echo/where/middleast/palestine_en#:~:text=Since%202000%2C%20the%20European%20Union,needs%20 of%20the%20Palestinian%20population.

  • European Commission (2021, 1 January). European Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations,Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/ neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/countries/palestine_enEuropean Commission (2021, 13 April). European Civil and Humanitarian Aid Operations; Palestine, Factsheet, Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/echo/where/middle-east/palestine_en

  • European Council (1980, 13 June). Venice Declaration. Available online at: https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/mepp/docs/venice_ declaration_1980_en.pdf.

  • European Council, (1999, 24-25 March). Meeting in Berlin, Presidency Conclusions, Available online at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/ber2_en.htm

  • Fridlund, S. (2010). Payer not a player; The European Union as a marginal player in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, STVK01, Spring 2010, 1-25.

  • Gourlay, C. (2012). The Politics of EU civilian interventions and the strategic deficit of CSDP, EU Crisis Management Paper Series. Brussels: DCAF.

  • Heimann, G. (2011, 2 December). Israel and the European Union; Four decades of missed opportunities, Available online at: https://booksandideas.net/Israel-and-the-European-Union.html

  • Hollis, R. (2011). “Europe and the Middle East: Has the EU missed its moment of opportunity?”. Ortadoğu Etütleri, Vol 2, No 2, 33-56.

  • Jaya, J. and Ooij, J.V. (2018). Palestine: A Unique Case?. European Policy Review, Vol. 2, No1, 95-100. Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order. New York: Penguin Press.

  • Kohl, W.L. (1976). The United States Western Europe and The Energy Problem. Journal of International Affairs, Vol.30(1), 81-96.

  • Levitt, M. (2006). Hamas Politics, Charity and Terrorism in the Service oh Jihad. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

  • Lovatt, H. (2021, 18 March). Back to democracy: Europe, Hamas and Palestinian elections, Available online at: https://ecfr.eu/publication/back-to-democracy-europe-hamas-and-the-palestinian-elections/

  • Mercan, S. (2016). Avrupa Birliği’nin bölgesel ihtilaflara yönelik politikaları: Abhazya ve Güney Osetya,Batı Sahra, Dağlık Karabağ, İsrail-Filistin ve Transdinyester, U. B. Yıldız (Ed.) Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

  • Miskel, J. F. (2005). The Palestinian Intifada: an effective strategy. World Policy Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4 Winter-2004-2005, 48-56.

  • Muasher, M. and Brown, N. J. (2018). Two States or one?: Reappraising the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse, E.P. Djerejian, M. Muasher, N.J. Brown (Ed.) Massachusetts: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  • Müller, P. (2012). EU Foreign Policymaking and the Middle East conflict; The Europeanization of national foreign policy, First Published. New York: Routledge.

  • Nasrallah, R. and Santoro, S. (2005). “The view of Brussels from Palestine”. The External Image of the European Union. Research Project Forum on the Problems of War and Peace & University of Bologna.

  • Nuttall, S. J. (2000). European Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Oppenheim, B. (2021, 23 April). Halting Palestine’s Democratic Decline, Carnegie Europe, Available online at: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/04/23/halting-palestine-s-democratic-decline-pub-84383

  • Pace, M. (2010). The end of EU democracy promotion and of the two-state solution? Esra Bulut Aymat (Ed.) European Involvement in the Arab-Israeli Conflict (s.87-97). Paris: Chaillot Papers.

  • Persson, A. (2018). “EU differentiation as a case of ‘Normative Power Europe’ (NPE) in the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. Journal of European Integration, 40:2, 193-208.

  • Peters, J. (2010). “Europe and the Israel-Palestinian Peace Process: The Urgency Now”, European Security, 19: 3, 511-529.

  • Ramahi, S. (2013). Corruption in the Palestinian Authority. The Middle East Monitor, Special Report, 1-16.Robinson, K. (2021, 12 April). What is U.S. policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?, Foreign Affairs, Available online at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-us-policy-israeli-palestinian-conflict.

  • Schulz, H. L. (1999). The Reconstruction of Palestinian Nationalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Selleslaghs, J. (2014). Conflicting Role Conceptions: In Search of the European Union’s Added Value for itsSouthern Neighbors, College of Europe, UNU Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies. Brugge: Bruges Regional Integration Papers.

  • Sjösted, G. (1977). The External Role of the European Community. Farnborough: Saxon House.

  • Shafi, A.A. (2015). Realigning EU policy in Palestine towards a viable state economy and restored dignity, Middle East and North Africa Programme, Chatttam House, Research Paper.

  • Soliman, A. (2011). The Euro Med partnership and the Arab Israeli conflict, The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence. London: The Atkin Paper Series, 1-28.

  • Solona, J. (2009, 11 July). Europe’s global role-what next steps? Ditchley Foundation Annual Lecture XLV, Available online at: http://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/352/ditchley-lecture-xlv.htm.

  • Spencer, C. (1997). Building Confidence in the Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 2(2), 23-48.

  • Terpan, F. (2010). EU-Israel Relations: in Search of Coherent and Consistent EU Foreign Policy, GarnetConference- “The EU in International Affairs II” Brussels: 22-24 April. Panel H3 Europe’s Neighbourhood.The Council of the European Union (2003, 12 December). A Secure Europe in a Better World, European Security Strategy, Brussels. Available online at: www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/ media/solanae.pdf

  • The Council of the European Union (2009). A Secure Europe in a Better World, European Security Strategy, Brussels, Available online at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ media/30823/qc7809568enc.pdf.

  • The EU External Action (2005). About us, Available online at: https://www.eubam-rafah.eu/en/node/5048.

  • The EU External Action (2021). EUPOL COPPS: At a Glance, Available online at: https://eupolcopps.eu/page/facts/en

  • Tocci, N. (2009). “Firm in Rhetoric, Compromising in Reality: The EU in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict”. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 8, No. 3–4, 387–401.

  • United Nations Security Council/UNSC (1967). Resolution 242 of 22 November 1967, Available online at: https://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/7D35E1F729 DF491C852 56EE700686136

  • United Nations Security Council/UNSC (1973). Resolution 338 of 22 October 1973, Available online at: https://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/7FB7C26FC BE80 A31852560C50065F8

  • Vasconcelos, A. and Joffe, G. (2004). Towards Euro-Mediterranean Regional Integration”, MediterraneanPolitics, Special Issue on the Barcelona Process. Building a Euro-Mediterranean Regional Community, 5(1), 3-6.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics