İŞYERİ DEĞİŞTİRME KARŞISINDA İŞGÖREN SESLİLİĞİNİN SÜRDÜRÜLMESİNDE TEMEL DİNAMİKLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA
Author :
Abstract
Araştırma, bir önceki işyerinde işgören sesliliğinin, yeni mikro işyerinde sürdürülmesinde etkili olabilecek temel dinamiklerin neler olduğunun belirlenmesi amacı taşımaktadır. Mikro işyerlerinin özelliğinden kaynaklanan işgören sayısının azlığı (10 işgören) iletişim olanakları ile işgören sesliliğinin sürdürülmesine önemli katkılar sağlayabileceği düşünülmüştür. Bu düşünce araştırmanın, mikro işyerlerine odaklanılmasına neden olmuştur. Bir önceki mikro işyerinde sesliliği benimsemiş işgörenlerin yeni işyerlerinde sesliliği sürdürme çabaları nitel (görüşme) ve nicel (ölçek) yöntemlerle araştırılmıştır. Her iki yöntemin bulgularının birbirlerini destekler nitelikte olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırmanın nitel kısmından elde edilen bulgulara göre, yeni işyerlerinde işgören sesliliğinin sürdürülmesine işgörenlerin proaktif davranışları, girişimcinin tutumu, sesliliğin yararları, etkili iletişim, girişimciye duyulan güven ve işyerinin sürekliliği için iş güvencesinin korunma amacının güdülmesi temel dinamikler arasında değerlendirilmiştir. Nicel yöntemlerinden elde edilen bulgular için frekans ve çapraz tablolar kullanılmıştır. Verilen yanıtlara göre çapraz tablolarda, demografik özellikler ve ölçek maddeleri arasındaki ilişkiler hangi maddelerde ayrımlaştığı değerlendirilmiştir. Yine, kullanılan ölçek ile elde olunan bulgular mikro işyerlerinde işgören sesliliğinin sürdürüldüğünü göstermektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of the research is to determine what are the main dynamics that may be effective in maintaining employee voice in the previous workplace in the new micro workplace. It has been thought that the small number of employees (10 employees) caused by the characteristics of micro-workplaces can make a significant contribution to maintaining the voice of the workforce with communication opportunities.This thought has led to the focus of the research on micro-workplaces. The efforts of the employees who adopted the voice in the previous micro workplace to maintain the voice in the new workplace were investigated by qualitative (interview) and quantitative (scale) methods. It has been observed that the findings of both methods support each other. According to the findings obtained from the qualitative part of the researh, the new employee proactive behavior of employees in the new workplaces to the resumption of the voice, the attitude of the entrepreneur, the benefits of voice, effective communication, confidence, entrepreneurs, and job security with the protection of the purpose of the continuity of the workplace meant to be among basic dynamics were evaluated. Frequency and cross-tables were used for the findings obtained from quantitative methods. According to the answers given, the relationships between demographic characteristics and scale items were evaluated in which items were decoupled in the cross-tables. Also, the findings obtained with the scale used indicate that the voice of the employees is maintained in micro-workplaces.
Keywords
- Abdulgalimov, D., Kirkham, R., Nicholson, J., Vlachokyriakos, V., Briggs, P., & Olivier, P. (2020).
- Abdulgalimov, D., Kirkham, R., Nicholson, J., Vlachokyriakos, V., Briggs, P., & Olivier, P. (2020).Designing for employee voice. CHI '20, Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 25-30, CHI, Honolulu, HI, USA.
- Alfayad, Z., &, Arif, L. S. M. (2017). Employee voice and job satisfaction: an application of Herzberg two- factor theory. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1): 150-156.
- Arslan, A., & Yener, S. (2016). İşgören sesliliği ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması çalışması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(1): 173-191.
- Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: the mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal Business Ethics, 107: 21-34.
- Constantin, E. C., & Baia, C. C. (2015). Employee voice-key factor in internal communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191: 975-978.
- Dundon, T., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M., & Ackers, P. (2004). The meanings and purpose of employee voice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6): 1149-1170.
- Farndale, E., Ruiten, J. V., Kelliher, C., & Hope-Hailey, V. (2011). The influence of perceived employeevoice on organizational commitment: An exchange perspective. Human Resource Management, 50(1): 113- 129.
- Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: the moderating role of empoweringleader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4): 787-798.
- Holland, P., Cooper, B. K., & Hecker, B. (2016). Use of social media at work: a new form of employee voice? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27:21: 2621-2634.
- Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
- Kaufmann, B. E. (2015). Theorising determinants of employee voice: an integrative model across disciplines and levels of analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1): 19-40.
- Lam, L. W., Loi,R., Ka Wai Chan, K. W., (2016). Voice more and stay longer: how ethical leaders influence employee voice and exit intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(3): 277-300.
- Li, Y., & Sun, J. M. (2015). Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior: a cross-level examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2): 172-189.
- Miles, S. J., & Mangold, W. G. (2014). Employee voice: untapped resource or social media time bomb? Business Horizons, 57(3): 401-411.
- Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. M. (2015). An integrative review of employee voice:identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17: 382-400.
- Nechanska, E., Hughes, E., & Dundon, T. (2020). Towards an integration of employee voice and silence. Human Resource Management Review, 30 (1): 1-11.
- Pyman, A., Cooper, B., Teicher, J., & Holland, P. (2006). A comparison of the effectiveness of employee voice arrangements in Australia. Industrial Relations Journal, 37(5): 543-559.
- Qi, L., & Liu, B. (2017). Effects of ınclusive leadership on employee voice behavior and team performance:the mediating role of caring ethical climate. Front Communication, 2(8), www.frontiersin.com, (Erişim Tarihi: 17.09.2021).
- Qian, J., Li, X., Wang, B., Song, B., Zhang, W., Chen, M., & Qu, Y. (2018). A role theory perspective onhow and when Goal-Focused leadership influences employee voice behavior. Frontiers. Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01244, (Erişim Tarihi: 16.09.2021).
- Rees, C., Alfes, K., & Gatenby, m. 2013. Employee voice and engagement: connections and consequences. International Journal of Human Resource Management 24 (14): 2780-2798.
- Ruck, K., Welch, M., & Menara, B. (2017). Employee voice: An antecedent to organisational engagement? Public Relations Review, 43(5): 904-914.
- Sax, J., & Torp, S. S. (2015). Speak up! enhancing risk performance with enterprise risk management, leadership style and employee voice. Management Decision Vol. 53(7): 1452-1468.
- Takeuchi, R., Chen, Z., & Cheung, S. Y. (2012). Applyıng uncertainty management theory to employee voice behavior: an integrative investıgation. Personnel Psychology, 65: 283-323.
- Tangırala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65: 251-282.
- Townsend, K., Wiilkinson, A., Dundon, T., & Mombray, P. K. (2020). Tracking employee voice: developingthe concept of voice pathways. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,1- 22, https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12271 (Erişim Tarihi: 16.09.2021).
- Um-e-Rubbab, Um-E., &Naqvi, S.M.M.R. (2020). Employee voice behavior as a critical factor fororganizational sustainability in the telecommunications industry. 3, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238451, (Erişim Tarihi: 17.09.2021).
- Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6): 1359-1392.
- Venkataramani V., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Lia, H., & Shi, J. (2016). Social networks and employee voice: theinfluence of team members’and team leaders’ social network positions on employee voice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132: 37-48.
- Wilkinson, A., Barry, M., & Morrison, E. (2019) Toward an integration of research on employee voice. Human Resource Management Review, 1-10.
- Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P. J., Kalfa, S., & Xu, Y. (2018). Voices unheard: employee voice in the new century. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5): 711-724.
- Wood, S. J., & Wall, T. D. (2007). Work enrichment and employee voice in human resource management- performance studies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(7): 1335-1372.
- Xu, M., Qin, X., Dust, S. B., & Direnzo, M. S. (2019). Supervisor-subordinate proactive personalitycongruence and psychologicalsafety: A signaling theory approach to 3mployee voice behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4): 440-453.
- Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: a dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (1): 25-36.
- Edmondson, V. C. (2006). Commentary organizational surveys: a system for employee voice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(4): 307-310.
- Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. M. (2021). High-performance work systems and employee voice behaviour: an integrated model and research agenda. Personnel Review, 50(6): 1530-1543.
